A2Z Sync · Automotive Retail

Keeping the one-person, one-hour model intact through negotiation.

I designed and shipped A2Z Sync’s first negotiation tool, allowing advisors and managers to work within the same deal without forcing the advisor to leave the customer.

My role
Sole Product Designer
Partners
Chief Product Director and Lead Engineer
Timeline
4 months to production
Adoption
4+ locations using it daily

01 · The market limitation

A one-price product entering a negotiating market.

A2Z Sync was created for one-price dealerships. Without a way to set negotiation limits and protect profit, the product could not support dealerships that negotiated vehicle or trade values.

A2Z Sync desking experience used by dealership staff
The past desking experience. A2Z Sync supported the purchase workflow, but negotiation required new controls for managers and client advisors.

02 · Research

The workflow looked physical. The opportunity was technical.

I worked onsite and remotely with dealership managers, financial advisors, and client advisors. Concern mapping, heuristic evaluation, and storyboarding showed that managers needed control without becoming the middleman.

Concern mapping covering client advisor and manager negotiation needs
Concern mapping. I mapped what advisors feared, what managers needed to control, and where the workflow could break.
Heuristic evaluation of automotive negotiation tools
Heuristic evaluation. Comparable tools showed how financial advisors manipulated deal values and where existing patterns created confusion.
Storyboard showing the original negotiation workflow and manager handoff
Current workflow. Negotiation interrupted the one-person model by pulling the advisor away from the customer.
Storyboard showing the improved shared negotiation workflow
Ideal workflow. The manager prepared the limits before the advisor reached the deal dashboard.

03 · Three major versions

The right scope emerged through iteration.

We completed three major design versions before piloting the product with dealership staff.

Version one showing simple negotiation controls for one trade
V1 · One trade. Simple negotiation fields lived inside the trade modal.
Version two showing multiple trades and additional negotiation fields
V2 · Multiple trades. More financial fields and individual trade codes expanded the model.
Version three showing the full negotiation system on the dashboard
V3 · The full deal. Negotiation moved to the dashboard and connected trade, vehicle price, and overall profit.

04 · The final system

Discreet to customers. Clear to dealership staff.

Authorized managers set trade and vehicle-price limits inside a readable modal. Client advisors saw a coded summary on the customer-visible dashboard and could negotiate within those limits without leaving the customer.

Video playback may vary by browser. If it does not load, the final interface screenshot is displayed instead.

The production workflow. A manager changes a negotiation limit and the discreet shop code updates for the advisor.
Authorized manager

Readable controls

Only a manager with the correct access could open the modal, review profit, and set negotiation limits.

Client advisor

Discreet guidance

The dashboard code showed the advisor their room without exposing sensitive profit information to the customer beside them.

05 · Designing the rules

This was a system, not just a modal.

I defined the calculations, DMS field mapping, shared updates, save behavior, negotiation limits, and negative or zero states. The Lead Engineer helped adapt the concept to existing backend constraints.

Deal boundaries

Protect the source system

Each deal pulled from the DMS once. Manual changes stayed with that customer deal and were never pushed back to the DMS.

Shared work

Keep both roles current

More than one user could work in the deal. Saved limits and shop codes updated across users, with notifications when key values changed.

Guardrails

Make the limits real

Advisors could negotiate only within enabled allowances. Invalid changes reverted, while negative and zero-profit states followed explicit code rules.

06 · Outcome

A tool dealership staff understood without training.

The negotiation tool reached production in four months and was used daily by at least four locations. It reduced the manager’s role as a middleman and enabled A2Z Sync to support negotiating dealerships.

4 months to production
4+ locations using it daily
Market expansion enabled A2Z Sync could support negotiating dealerships

Dealership staff said the code was discreet enough for a customer-visible screen and clear enough for advisors to understand without a tutorial. It also gave new advisors a simple way to see how changing one number affected the rest of the deal.

07 · Leadership takeaway

The strongest design move was not the modal. It was asking the technical question that changed the product direction.

Connecting dealership behavior, A2Z Sync’s business model, and an existing system capability turned one dealership request into a product capability that enabled market expansion.